Perhaps you have noticed that Presidential elections always seem to revolve around hair around issues?
George Washington's powdered ponytail and Abraham Lincoln's beard were primary characteristics of the appearance and came to represent firm leadership and thoughtful concern for the general public.
In the past century, Teddy Roosevelt's moustache formed an exclamation point with regard to his energetic optimism. Warren Harding was elected largely because, with his metallic mane, he looked like a president. Dwight Eisenhower's bald head, John Kennedy's swoosh, Ronald Reagan's stubbornly un-graying excellence all helped define these leaders. More recently, the public has been captivated by John Edwards' $400 'do, Sarah Palin's beehive and John McCain's prematurely gray hair that no more is, um, premature.
These personalities have set an example for what we expect our nation's leaders to appear like. And whether hair-less or hair-endowed, appearances seem to count in our estimation of the candidate's worth. When Michael Dukakis hid his hair beneath an army headgear, he looked ridiculous and lost the election. When Tim Kaine, governor associated with Virginia, began appearing on national news shows, nearly every interviewer commented upon his weird-looking Hoffa-style hairdo. He didn't make it either.
But it appears to me if hair can define, develop or defeat our leaders, then all of us should be very, very careful about hair we may be showing that people really don't want to shape the opinions that others hold of all of us.
Could you imagine a woman candidate for office whose chin hair held creeping through her makeup in close-up, high-definition TV shots? That would function as the defining moment for her campaign. What about the virile male candidate who sets out to exhibit he's a dedicated family man by taking his kids for a swim within the lake, only to reveal a tangled mass of back hair. Who would vote for his face about the yard signs if all they could think of was what he appeared as if when he turned away? What about the woman candidate on her ninth campaign stop from the day, climbing to the podium with legs that desperately need shaving but which she hasn't has a moment to deal with?
As we move through life, our concerns about losing hair on our head or evolving from "salt-and-pepper" to just "salt" begin a backseat to our thoughts about laser hair removal. Not many men are truly embarrassed nowadays by revealing they're bald, but hair growing in unwanted locations that are suddenly exposed can create a traumatic experience for a man or a woman.
We live in a very visual world with our 15 minutes of fame on TV, streaming video on our Internet sites and online videoconferencing. If we want to look like leaders, we have to be sure our hair reflects an image of care and perfection. In yesteryear, shaving has been the traditional way to confront this issue, but leaders are spending more of time on the road, on the air or on the stage; and hair always finds a method to grow back when and where it is least welcome.
It's no wonder that we see so many women and men now visiting the laser hair removal clinic. Laser hair removal can permanently destroy follicles of hair so we never again need to worry about the reappearance of undesirable hair. A study by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery found that the number of laser hair-removal treatments in the usa for both men and women increased 100 percent from 2002 to 2006. Within 2007, almost 1. 5 million laser hair removal procedures were performed.
This method of hair removal has become so popular because the only method to permanently reduce the amount of unwanted hair, anywhere on the entire body, is to damage hair follicles so that they no longer can create hairs. The latest lasers are highly effective and produce virtually no pain throughout the hair-removal process. These lasers heat hair down to its roots, killing the follicles without harming your skin. Hair follicles grow hairs at different rates and are most effectively destroyed within the growth stage. So physicians usually recommend a series of hair-removal treatments on the period of to catch all the hairs at their various proper phases. Each individual should be evaluated separately, but most laser hair removal centers recommend no less than six treatments, with each treatment separated by about two months.
The only time when laser treatment may be uncomfortable usually is when non-specialty clinics use older equipment. Contemporary lasers combine pulsed, high-intensity light with precisely controlled radiofrequency waves to harm follicles without irritation.
If you're campaigning for a leadership position in your organization, your organization, your school or your social group, consider what a presidential-aura demands. Make the most of the hair that enhances your chances; make the least of the hair that would stay in the manner.
George Washington's powdered ponytail and Abraham Lincoln's beard were primary characteristics of the appearance and came to represent firm leadership and thoughtful concern for the general public.
In the past century, Teddy Roosevelt's moustache formed an exclamation point with regard to his energetic optimism. Warren Harding was elected largely because, with his metallic mane, he looked like a president. Dwight Eisenhower's bald head, John Kennedy's swoosh, Ronald Reagan's stubbornly un-graying excellence all helped define these leaders. More recently, the public has been captivated by John Edwards' $400 'do, Sarah Palin's beehive and John McCain's prematurely gray hair that no more is, um, premature.
These personalities have set an example for what we expect our nation's leaders to appear like. And whether hair-less or hair-endowed, appearances seem to count in our estimation of the candidate's worth. When Michael Dukakis hid his hair beneath an army headgear, he looked ridiculous and lost the election. When Tim Kaine, governor associated with Virginia, began appearing on national news shows, nearly every interviewer commented upon his weird-looking Hoffa-style hairdo. He didn't make it either.
But it appears to me if hair can define, develop or defeat our leaders, then all of us should be very, very careful about hair we may be showing that people really don't want to shape the opinions that others hold of all of us.
Could you imagine a woman candidate for office whose chin hair held creeping through her makeup in close-up, high-definition TV shots? That would function as the defining moment for her campaign. What about the virile male candidate who sets out to exhibit he's a dedicated family man by taking his kids for a swim within the lake, only to reveal a tangled mass of back hair. Who would vote for his face about the yard signs if all they could think of was what he appeared as if when he turned away? What about the woman candidate on her ninth campaign stop from the day, climbing to the podium with legs that desperately need shaving but which she hasn't has a moment to deal with?
As we move through life, our concerns about losing hair on our head or evolving from "salt-and-pepper" to just "salt" begin a backseat to our thoughts about laser hair removal. Not many men are truly embarrassed nowadays by revealing they're bald, but hair growing in unwanted locations that are suddenly exposed can create a traumatic experience for a man or a woman.
We live in a very visual world with our 15 minutes of fame on TV, streaming video on our Internet sites and online videoconferencing. If we want to look like leaders, we have to be sure our hair reflects an image of care and perfection. In yesteryear, shaving has been the traditional way to confront this issue, but leaders are spending more of time on the road, on the air or on the stage; and hair always finds a method to grow back when and where it is least welcome.
It's no wonder that we see so many women and men now visiting the laser hair removal clinic. Laser hair removal can permanently destroy follicles of hair so we never again need to worry about the reappearance of undesirable hair. A study by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery found that the number of laser hair-removal treatments in the usa for both men and women increased 100 percent from 2002 to 2006. Within 2007, almost 1. 5 million laser hair removal procedures were performed.
This method of hair removal has become so popular because the only method to permanently reduce the amount of unwanted hair, anywhere on the entire body, is to damage hair follicles so that they no longer can create hairs. The latest lasers are highly effective and produce virtually no pain throughout the hair-removal process. These lasers heat hair down to its roots, killing the follicles without harming your skin. Hair follicles grow hairs at different rates and are most effectively destroyed within the growth stage. So physicians usually recommend a series of hair-removal treatments on the period of to catch all the hairs at their various proper phases. Each individual should be evaluated separately, but most laser hair removal centers recommend no less than six treatments, with each treatment separated by about two months.
The only time when laser treatment may be uncomfortable usually is when non-specialty clinics use older equipment. Contemporary lasers combine pulsed, high-intensity light with precisely controlled radiofrequency waves to harm follicles without irritation.
If you're campaigning for a leadership position in your organization, your organization, your school or your social group, consider what a presidential-aura demands. Make the most of the hair that enhances your chances; make the least of the hair that would stay in the manner.
